Bonus $100
Promo Codes 2024
USA Elections 2024
Users' Choice
90
89
88
85

Secretive to the core

17 May 2010
00:00
Read More

Apple's lost iPhone has already entered folklore, but this apparently simple case has become a touch-point for a host of other issues. An Apple software engineer, Gray Powell, lost the phone while celebrating his 27th birthday at a Silicon Valley bar. Another bar patron found the phone, recognized it as an Apple prototype and tried to return it to the company. Apple never called him back and some weeks later he sold it to blogsite Gizmodo for $5,000. Gizmodo spent a week dissecting the device and then published its findings.

Apple complained to the police that the phone had been stolen. A police special forces team broke down the door of Gizmodo editor Jason Chen and seized his computers and servers.

The direct result of this leak is that Apple has lost a PR opportunity. The iPhone 4.0 was expected to be unveiled in early June. (Some bloggers claimed Apple contrived to lose the phone, but they obviously don't know Apple.)

Of course, this created some PR upside, too. There aren't many people on the planet who don't know that a new iPhone is coming, but you don't hear any thanks from Apple for that.

Protecting IP

The genuine issue for Apple is the exposure of its intellectual property - a loss worth potentially millions. Its competitors know what the new device is all about: a squarer design, a front-facing camera for video chat, a larger battery. Knockoffs are no doubt already on their way to the Dongguan assembly line.

But who is to blame for that? Not the finder, surely, who called Apple customer service line to report the device. Apple's accusation of theft by definition is a false one because he made efforts to return the device.

Indeed, thanks to Apple's secretive company culture, customer service reps had no idea an iPhone 4.0 was even being developed let alone had been lost. According to an Apple staffer quoted by Gizmodo, call center reps thought the call was a hoax.

A side issue is whether journalist US shield laws apply to blogsites. Are bloggers also journalists deserving of the protection of the law? Well, not a problem in Asia, where the laws routinely protect governments from journalists, not the other way around.
For the mobile industry the issue is Apple and its disproportional response. Gizmodo returned the phone yet the company still reported it as "stolen" to the police, who broke down Jason Chen's door.

.

Related content

Tags:
Rating: 5