Bonus $100
Promo Codes 2024
USA Elections 2024
Users' Choice
90
89
88
85

The beer analogy for interference control

11 Nov 2013
00:00
Read More

Controlling interference in mobile networks can have the same effect as a team of big guys taking on smaller opponents in a contest to drink a keg of beer.

The theory goes the larger team wins because they have more capacity, in this case thanks to interference cancellation.

Michael Thelander, chief executive and founder of Signals Research group, used the analogy to explain the importance of minimizing interference. “We know interference exists. [We] can’t get rid of it, but [we] can control it,” he told journalists and analysts attending Qualcomm’s first Modem Performance Workshop, which took place in San Francisco late last week.

Because interference increases with signal strength, having five bars on your phone is an indication of signal strength “not quality,” Thelander said, adding the display means there is “a lot of RF energy.”

Thelander explained that networks aren’t always to blame for poor reception. “[The] device can influence network performance,” he said, adding that network efficiency can be improved by up to 32% by deploying interference cancellation on devices.

Tests of mobile modems reveal a “big difference in the performance of chipsets as well as devices,” Thelander said, citing research in early 2013 of the performance of LTE chipsets from eight vendors. The chips “generally all perform the same” while stationary and with ideal network conditions, but there was a 28% difference between the best and worst performing when tested on the move.

Knowing the network conditions is key to testing mobile modems, Thelander explained, noting that he tests devices at all times of the day to account for differences in network loads and performance. It is also important to know all devices in a test are using the same cell site, he noted, citing a test in which each device was accessing a separate tower. “Device placement is critical and the behavior is unpredictable.”

.

Related content

Rating: 5